Research portfolio
Foundational frameworks. Current infrastructure. One public record.
The portfolio distinguishes published research lineage from the repositories that currently define Waveframe's technical behavior.
Aurora Research Initiative
Published institutional-governance research. It does not currently govern product development or runtime authority.
Read the framework → Foundational · MaintenanceAurora Workflow Orchestration
Published reproducibility methodology and historical CRI-CORE lineage. It is not a current workflow dependency.
Read the methodology → Published · StableNeurotransparency
Doctrine and specification for cognitive attribution and disclosure, preserved as research rather than current product compliance.
Read doctrine and specification → Current · ActiveExecution-governance infrastructure
Deterministic policy compilation, published authority, proposal evaluation, runtime enforcement, and durable evidence.
Read the technical model →Shared commitments
What remains true across the work.
Humans retain institutional authority.
AI can contribute analysis, proposals, and transformations. It does not silently acquire the right to approve its own work.
Artifacts carry the research record.
Claims, evidence, reviews, decisions, and execution results must survive beyond a conversation or model session.
Ambiguity is surfaced, not guessed away.
When authority or evidence cannot be positively established, the system should stop and require resolution.
Consequences require admissibility.
Reasoning and execution are separate boundaries. A plausible proposal is not automatically an authorized action.
Research record
Follow the artifacts, not the claims.
Publications, DOI-backed releases, source repositories, and the chronological institutional log provide the inspectable record behind the work.